SCIENCE, PRACTICE AND EDUCATION REFERENCES 1. Delamater AM. Improving patient adherence. Clin Diabetes. 2006; 24(2):71–7. 2. Kent D, Melkus GD, Stuart PW, McKoy JM, Urbanski P, Boren SA, et al. Reducing the risks of diabetes complications through diabetes self-manage- ment education and support. Popul Health Manag. 2013; 16(2):74–81. 3. Gonzalez JS, Tanenbaum ML, Commissariat PV. Psychosocial factors in medication adherence and diabetes self-management. Am Psychol. 2016; 51(3):162–84. 4. Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson-Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet. 2005; 366(9498):1719–24. 5. de Ridder D, Geenen R, Kuijer R, van Middendorp H. Psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Lancet. 2008; 372(9634):246–55. 6. Keles H, Ekici A, Ekici M, Bulcun E, Altinkaya V. Effect of chronic diseases and associated psychological distress on health-related quality of life. Intern Med J. 2007; 37(1):6–11. 7. Fortin M, Bravo G, Hudon C, Lapointe L, Dubois M. Psychological distress and multimorbidity in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2006; 4(5):417–22. 8. Chatterjee S, Khunti K, Davies MJ. Type 2 diabetes. Lancet. 2017; 389(10085):2239–51. doi. org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30058-2. 9. Bommer C, Sagalova V, Heesemann E, Manne- Goehler J, Atun R, Bärnighausen T, et al. Global economic burden of diabetes in adults: Projections from 2015 to 2030. Diabetes Care. 2018; 41(5):963– 70. doi:10.2337/dc17-1962. 10. International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas. 9th ed. Brussels, Belgium: International Diabetes Federation; 2019. 11. Zheng Y, Ley SH, Hu FB. Global aetiology and epidemiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its complications. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2018; 14(2):88– 98. doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2017.151. 12. De las Cuevas C. Towards a clarification of terminology in medicine taking behavior: Compli- ance, adherence and concordance are related although different terms with different uses. Curr Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 6(2):74–7. 13. Bell JS, Airaksinen MS, Lyles A, Chen TF, Aslani P. Concordance is not synonymous with compliance or adherence. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007; 64(5):710–3. 14. Lutfey KE, Wishner WJ. Beyond “compliance” is “adherence.” Diabetes Care. 1999; 22(4):635–9. 15. Donovan JL, Blake DR. Patient non-compliance: Deviance or reasoned decision-making? Soc Sci Med. 1992; 34(5):507–13. 16. Russell S, Daly J, Hughes E, Op’T Hoog C. Nurses and “difficult” patients: Negotiating non-compliance. J Adv Nurs. 2003; 43(3):281–7. 17. Hobden A. Concordance: A widely used term, but what does it mean? Br J Community Nurs. 2006; 11(6):257–60. 18. Bissonnette JM. Adherence: A concept analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2008; 63(6):634–43. 19. Bajramovic J, Emmerton L, Tett SE. Perceptions around concordance - Focus groups and semi-struc- tured interviews conducted with consumers, pharmacists and general practitioners. Heal Expect. 2004; 7(3):221–34. 20. Segal JZ. “Compliance” to “concordance”: A critical view. J Med Humanit. 2007; 28(2):81–96. 21. Cushing A, Metcalfe R. Optimizing medicines management: From compliance to concordance. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007; 3(6):1047–58. 22. McCoy M. Autonomy, consent, and medical paternalism: Legal issues in medical intervention. J Altern Complement Med. 2008; 14(6):785–92. 23. Binning J, Woodburn J, Bus SA, Barn R. Motiva- tional interviewing to improve adherence behaviours for the prevention of diabetic foot ulceration. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2019; 35(2):1–11. 24. van Netten JJ, Price P., Lavery LA, Monteiro-Soares M. Prevention of foot ulcers in the at-risk patients with diabetes: A systematic review. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016; 32:84–98. 25. Poulton B. Factors Which Influence Patient Compliance. J Tissue Viability [Internet]. 1991;1(4):108–10. 26. Russell S, Daly J, Hughes E, Op’T Hoog C. Nurses and “difficult” patients: Negotiating non-compliance. J Adv Nurs. 2003;43(3):281–7. 27. Rosenstock IM, Strecher VJ, Becker MH. Social learning theory and the health belief model. Heal Educ Behav. 1988; 15(2):175–83. 28. Dines A. A review of lay health beliefs research: Insights for nursing practice in health promotion. J Clin Nurs. 1994; 3(6):329–38. 29. Leventhal H, Benyamini Y, Shafer C. Lay beliefs about health and illness. In: Ayers S, Baum A, McManus C, Newman S, Wallston K, Weinman J, et al., editors. Cambridge handbook of psychology, health and medicine. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007. p. 124–8. 30. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model. A decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984; 11(1):1–47. 31. Harrison JA, Mullen PD, Green LW. A meta-analysis of studies of the health belief model with adults. Health Educ Res. 1992; 7(1):107–16. 32. Abraham A, Silber TJ, Lyon M. Psychosocial aspects of chronic illness in adolescence. Indian J Pediatr. 1999; 66(3):447–53. 33. Brownlee-Duffeck M, Peterson L, Simonds JF, Goldstein D, Kilo C, Hoette S. The role of health beliefs in the regimen adherence and metabolic control of adolescents and adults with diabetes mellitus. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987; 55(2):139– 44. 34. Harvey JN, Lawson VL. The importance of health belief models in determining self-care behaviour in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2009; 26(1):5–13. 35. Mayer J, Salovey P, Caruso D. Emotional intelligence: Theory, findings and implications. Psychol Inq. 2004; 15(3):197–215. 36. Umaki TM, Umaki MR, Cobb CM. The psychology of patient compliance: A focused review of the literature. J Periodontol. 2012; 83(4):395–400. 37. Ben-Zur H, Reshef-Kfir Y. Risk taking and coping strategies among Israeli adolescents. J Adolesc. 2003; 26(3):255–65. 38. Wallston KA, Wallston BS, Devellis R. Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Educ Monogr. 1978; 6(2):160–70. 39. Náfrádi L, Nakamoto K, Schulz PJ. Is patient empowerment the key to promote adherence? A systematic review of the relationship between self-efficacy, health locus of control and medication adherence. PLoS One. 2017; 17;12(10):e0186458. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186458. PMID: 29040335; PMCID: PMC5645121. 40. O’Hea EL, Grothe KB, Bodenlos JS, Boudreaux ED, White MA, Brantley PJ. Predicting medical regimen adherence: The interactions of health locus of control beliefs. J Health Psychol. 2005; 10(5):705–17. 41. Wiese SL, Vallacher RR, Strawinska U. Dynamical social psychology: Complexity and coherence in human experience. Soc Personal Psychol Compass. 2010; 4(11):101 42. Hughner RS, Kleine SS. Views of health in the lay sector: A compilation and review of how individuals think about health. Health (Irvine Calif ). 2004; 8(4):395–422. 43. Hughner RS, Kleine SS. Variations in lay health theories: Implications for consumer health care decision making. Qual Health Res. 2008; 18(12):1687–703. 44. Moorman C, Matulich E. A model of consumers’ preventive health behaviors: The role of health motivation and health ability. J Consum Res. 1993; 20(2):208-28. 45. Bus SA, van Netten JJ. A shift in priority in diabetic foot care and research: 75% of foot ulcers are preventable. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016; 32:195–200. 46. Prompers L, Huijberts M, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, Bakker K, Edmonds M, et al. Resource utilisation and costs associated with the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. Prospective data from the Eurodiale Study. Diabetologia. 2008; 51(10):1826–34. 47. Pound N, Chipchase S, Treece K, Game F, Jeffcoate W. Ulcer-free survival following management of foot ulcers in diabetes. Diabet Med. 2005; 22(10):1306– 9. 48. Mazzuca SA. Does patient education in chronic disease have therapeutic value? J Chronic Dis. 1982; 35(7):521–9. 49. Armstrong DG, Boulton AJM, Bus SA. Diabetic foot ulcers and their recurrence. N Engl J Med. 2017; 376(24):2367–75. 50. Rubak S, Sandbæk A, Lauritzen T, Christensen B. Motivational interviewing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Gen Pract. 2005; 55(513):305– 12. 51. Laws MB, Rose GS, Beach MC, Lee Y, Rogers WS, Velasco AB, et al. Patient-provider concordance with behavioral change goals drives measures of motiva- tional interviewing consistency. Patient Ed Couns. 2015; 98(6):728–33. doi.org/10.1016/j. pec.2015.02.014. 52. Moral R, Torres L, Ortega L, Larumbe M, Villalobos A, García J, et al. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing to improve therapeutic adherence in patients over 65 years old with chronic diseases: A cluster randomized clinical trial in primary care. Patient Ed Couns. 2015; 98(8):977–83. 53. Pollak K. Learning what is in the “secret sauce” of MI that is essential for teaching busy clinicians. Patient Ed Couns. 2015; 98(4):399–400. 54. Copeland L, McNamara R, Kelson M, Simpson S. Mechanisms of change within motivational interviewing in relation to health behaviors outcomes: A systematic review. Patient Ed Couns. 2015; 98(4):401–11. 55. Miller NH, Hill M, Kottke T, Ockene IS. The multilevel compliance challenge: Recommendations for a call to action: A statement for healthcare professionals. Circulation. 1997; 95(4):1085–90. 56. Sugarman J, Reiber G, Baumgardner G, Prela C, Lowery J. Use of therapeutic footwear benefit among diabetic Medicare beneficiaries in three states, 1995. Diabetes Care. 1998; 21(5):777–81. 57. Amin N, Doupis J. Diabetic foot disease: From the evaluation of the “foot at risk” to the novel diabetic ulcer treatment modalities. World J Diabetes. 2016; 7(7):153–64. 58. Lavery LA, Wunderlich RP, Tredwell JL. Disease management for the diabetic foot: Effectiveness of a diabetic foot prevention program to reduce amputations and hospitalizations. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005; 70(1):31–7. 59. Lavery LA, Hunt N., LaFontaine J, Baxter C. Diabetic foot prevention: A neglected opportunity in high-risk patients. Diabetes Care. 2010; 33(7):1460– 2. JOURNAL OF WOUND MANAGEMENT 21 OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN WOUND MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
Share
Download PDF file
Build your own flipbook